Historic hearings on the Worldwide Court docket of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague have drawn to a detailed after greater than 100 nations and worldwide organisations introduced arguments over two weeks on who ought to bear obligation for the worsening local weather disaster.
Spearheading the trouble was Vanuatu which, alongside different Pacific island nations, says the local weather disaster poses a menace to its very existence.
“It’s with a profound sense of urgency and duty that I stand earlier than you in the present day,” Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s particular envoy for local weather change and surroundings, mentioned as he opened the hearings on December 2.
“The end result of those proceedings will reverberate throughout generations, figuring out the destiny of countries like mine and the way forward for our planet,” he mentioned.
Within the two weeks that adopted, dozens of nations made comparable entreaties, whereas a handful of main fossil fuel-producing nations argued polluters shouldn’t be held accountable.
Sebastien Duyck, a senior lawyer with the Middle for Worldwide Environmental Legislation (CIEL), which monitored the hearings, mentioned the nations arguing in opposition to authorized legal responsibility had been within the minority.
“Main polluters, together with america, United Kingdom, Russia, China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Norway, and Kuwait, discovered themselves remoted of their makes an attempt to play the authorized system to serve their self-interests and insulate themselves from accountability,” Duyck mentioned in an announcement.
“It’s time to break this cycle of hurt and impunity,” he added.
The ICJ’s 15 judges from all over the world should now take into account two questions: what are nations obliged to do below worldwide regulation to guard the local weather and surroundings from human-caused greenhouse gasoline emissions?
And what are the authorized penalties for governments when their acts, or lack of motion, have considerably harmed the local weather and surroundings?
Amongst nations that offered oral statements through the hearings was the State of Palestine, which joined different creating nations in calling for worldwide regulation to “take centre stage in defending humanity from the damaging path of human-made destruction ensuing from local weather change”.
The Palestinian assertion additionally supplied insights into the ways in which Israel’s unlawful occupation is each inflicting local weather change and hurting Palestinians’ potential to reply to it.
“There will be little doubt that the continuing unlawful Israeli belligerent occupation of Palestine and its discriminatory insurance policies have clear unfavourable local weather results,” Ammar Hijazi, the State of Palestine’s ambassador to the Netherlands, mentioned on Monday.
East Timor, often known as Timor-Leste, testified in help of Vanuatu’s case.
“The local weather disaster that we face in the present day is the results of the historic and ongoing actions of industrialised nations, which have reaped the advantages of speedy financial development, powered by colonial exploitation and carbon-intensive industries and practices,” Elizabeth Exposto, chief of employees to Timor-Leste’s prime minister, mentioned on Thursday.
“These nations, representing solely a fraction of the worldwide inhabitants, are overwhelmingly chargeable for the local weather disaster,” she added, “and but, the impacts of local weather change don’t respect borders.”
The hearings come after 132 nations on the United Nations General Assembly voted in March 2023 to help Vanuatu’s push for an opinion from the ICJ on the authorized obligations nations are below to guard present and future generations from local weather change.
The flip to courts to spur motion on local weather change additionally displays a rising diploma of dissatisfaction amongst some governments on the lack of progress in UN local weather negotiations, the place selections are primarily based on consensus.
The newest COP29 summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, concluded with wealthy nations pledging to contribute $300bn a 12 months by 2035 to assist poorer nations fight the results of local weather change.
However the Local weather Motion Community Worldwide, a community of 1,900 civil society teams in additional than 130 nations, described the deal as a “joke”, when put next with the prices creating nations are dealing with as local weather change worsens.
As Regenvanu famous in his assertion for Vanuatu, “it’s unconscionable that the COP failed to achieve any settlement on slicing emissions”.
“There may be an pressing want for a collective response to local weather change grounded not in political comfort however in worldwide regulation.”
WATCH LIVE: Vanuatu and the Melanesian Spearhead Group (collectively), South Africa, Albania and Germany open
the general public hearings within the advisory proceedings on Obligations of States in respect of Local weather Changehttps://t.co/qGazks5diA— CIJ_ICJ (@CIJ_ICJ) December 2, 2024
