Studying Time: 3 minutes
The feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar boiled over final summer season when the A-list rappers started firing off diss tracks at each other at a livid fee.
However the scenario got here to a head in February, when Kendrick took the stage for the Super Bowl halftime show.
As anticipated, he carried out “Not Like Us,” essentially the most savage of his Drake-inspired diss tracks.
The track had already been the topic of a Drake lawsuit against Universal Music Group (which is each his label and Kendrick’s).
Drake alleges that the label pushed false pedophilia allegations by selling the track.
He factors out that the Grammy-winning single resulted in a deluge of social media hate, and he even claims that it was the reason for a 2024 incident wherein a security guard was shot at Drake’s Toronto home throughout an tried break-in.
Now, attorneys for Drake have submitted an amended criticism wherein they particularly gripe about Kendrick’s halftime present, which was the most-watched in Tremendous Bowl historical past.
Drake’s authorized staff blasts Kendrick Lamar’s halftime present
“The Recording was carried out throughout the 2025 Tremendous Bowl and broadcast to the most important viewers for a Tremendous Bowl halftime present ever, over 133 million folks, together with tens of millions of kids, and tens of millions extra who had by no means earlier than heard the track or any of the songs that preceded it,” says a court docket doc obtained by Page Six.
It provides, “It was the primary, and can hopefully be the final, Tremendous Bowl halftime present orchestrated to assassinate the character of one other artist.”
Evidently, Drake and his legal professionals aren’t messing round right here. And whereas artists are usually free to hurl insults at each other in track type, this might grow to be a thorny case.
In spite of everything, at one level within the track, Kendrick labels Drake and his buddies “licensed pedophiles,” which is nearly essentially the most damaging declare one could make.
“Drake’s amended criticism makes an already robust case stronger,” his lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, stated in an announcement. “Drake will expose the proof of UMG’s misconduct, and UMG shall be held accountable for the results of its ill-conceived choices.”
Common’s response
In a scathing response, UMG alleges that Drake’s legal professionals have manipulated the rapper into falsely believing he has a case.
“Drake, unquestionably one of many world’s most completed artists and with whom we’ve loved a 16-year profitable relationship, is being misled by his authorized representatives into taking one absurd authorized step after one other,” the corporate stated.
“It’s shameful that these silly and frivolous authorized theatrics proceed.”
It stays to be seen if the 2 events will finally sq. off in court docket. But it surely appears apparent that essentially the most notorious hip hop feud in latest reminiscence is way from over.
